Trevor Englesen, Meghan Markle’s first husband, just detonated a verbal grenade that could blow apart her carefully constructed world once and for all.

In a no-holds-barred interview that’s already spreading like wildfire, he accused his ex of never truly letting go—meddling in his life years after their 2013 divorce—while threatening to march straight to Buckingham Palace with explosive evidence about her pregnancies, a hidden “dirty yacht past,” and even whispers of a secret early marriage at 19 that the public has never seen documented.

Englesen didn’t mince words: despite being on her third marriage to Prince Harry, Meghan “continues to interfere” through intermediaries, legal pressure, and attempts to control narratives around their shared history.

He claims business deals have mysteriously collapsed after anonymous tips, mutual friends have been pressured to pick sides, and entire chapters of their marriage have been quietly rewritten to fit her polished public image. “It’s not revenge,” a source close to him insisted. “It’s about finally setting the record straight—she won’t let me move on.”

The real bombshell? Englesen warned that if the interference doesn’t stop, he will formally approach the royal household with documents, emails, and witness accounts that could unravel long-dismissed rumors.

First: questions surrounding the births of Archie and Lilibet—timelines, public appearances, and private inconsistencies that have fueled surrogacy speculation for years, now elevated by someone who knew her intimately before royalty.

Second: her so-called “dirty yacht past,” a phrase dripping with implication—lavish parties, shadowy high-stakes networking, and associations with powerful figures that clash violently with the humanitarian persona she projects today. Englesen hinted he holds photos, guest lists, and testimonies ready to surface.

Then came the jaw-dropper few expected: confirmation of a possible first marriage at age 19 during her Northwestern University days—a whirlwind union (possibly to a fellow student or acquaintance like Joe Giuliano) that ended quickly, perhaps in annulment or deliberate concealment to protect her rising Hollywood ambitions.

Rumors of this early ceremony have lingered in tabloid shadows for years; Englesen’s direct acknowledgment, backed by alleged inconsistencies he uncovered during their marriage, pushes it from fringe theory to credible accusation.

Darker still are the persistent whispers—amplified by online forums, Radar Online leaks, and filmmaker Enrique Grunald’s claims—of a secret child, possibly a daughter quietly placed in an orphanage or with another family to avoid derailing her career. Englesen didn’t confirm outright but dropped cryptic lines like “There are stories she doesn’t want out,” leaving the door wide open.

The timing couldn’t be more brutal. With King Charles reportedly eyeing a leaner monarchy and public trust already frayed, any verified breach of transparency during Meghan’s vetting process—or evidence contradicting her official biography—could hand the palace the perfect justification to review (and potentially revoke) her Duchess of Sussex title.

One thing is clear: the walls Meghan built to protect her narrative are cracking—and the next move could shatter them completely.